The events in which the representatives and leaders of “Hezbollah” participate are not devoid of the phrase “dialogue”, and it has become closely related to the content of their opinion, but it is subject to adjustments to suit the changing atmosphere based on the international movement, especially related to the US-Iranian negotiations and the Iranian-Saudi agreement and its progress.

The events in which the deputies and leaders of “Hezbollah” participate are not devoid of the phrase “dialogue” and have become closely related to the content of their opinion. However, their opinions are subject to adjustments to suit the changing atmosphere based on the international movement, especially related to the US-Iranian negotiations and the Iranian-Saudi agreement and its progress, at times it seems calm is represented by extending a hand to shake hands, agreement and consensus, and sometimes it is overshadowed by the language of intimidation from a presidential vacuum, whose responsibility is placed on the party that rejects it, represented by the opposition that refuses to impose the name of former minister Suleiman Franjieh, the candidate of the duo “Amal Movement – Hezbollah” and stick to his candidacy, provided that the dialogue is outside this nomination.

A source accompanying the course of the “dialogues” explains by emphasizing that most of them have yielded disastrous results for the Lebanese Republic, especially when the scene between the interlocutors is unbalanced in terms of the balance of power, where some options are imposed as a result of the preponderance of one of the parties over the others, so how if the weapon was the pressing factor that legitimized his “Islamic resistance” and imposed it on all segments of Lebanese society under the slogan of liberating the occupied Lebanese territories, even though part of it is not recorded in the Lebanese real estate records, and thus it has become “loose lands”, sometimes its ownership is transferred to Syria and at other times to Lebanon, according to the necessities of maneuvering with “Israel”.

And the source continues, this legitimacy was drawn and included in most of the ministerial statements as a red line, as it was mentioned as an item that cannot be bypassed in the formulation, and at other times phrases revolved around, but the fixed content cannot be dropped from its equation, which consisted of 3 terms called the “Army – People – Resistance” trilogy, and it is still one of the constants, even if it is no longer declared publicly in festivals, after the change in the balance of power in terms of parliamentary representation and the fading of the star of Mar Mikhael’s understanding, which drained the balance of the popular movement and put it in a position of self-defense, after the economic and political collapse, which will be recorded in the history of the Republic as the worst era in the history of Lebanon in terms of the collapse witnessed by the Lebanese economy and its currency, in addition to the regional and international isolation, whether at the political level or at the level of conferences that used to flock abroad and internally in order to provide aid and loans, Lebanon has become today among the most prominent lists of countries where poverty and corruption dominate at high rates.

The source considers that everyone is waiting for the return of the French presidential envoy, Jean-Yves Le Drian, who is moving outside the flaming French arena, but analyzes and leaks have not been able to resolve the confused French position calling for dialogue within the approach adopted by the administration of French President Emmanuel Macron, and this is what made Le Drian’s task difficult, in light of the hardening of positions and the refusal to nominate any name imposed from the axis of opposition.

The source concludes with certainty that if the French presidential envoy was able to convince the parties to sit around a French-sponsored dialogue table, it will not be an integrated “basket”, but will be confined to the name of the presidential candidate, who will determine, it will be confined to the name of the presidential candidate, who will determine, through his political identity, the fate of the Lebanese Republic and the independence of its decision, away from the tutelage of the axis of opposition and Iran behind it, and this is evident in the position of the Iranian Minister of Labor, who considered Lebanon “part of the Islamic nation and defending it is tantamount to defending this nation”… Will Lebanon succeed in getting out of the Iranian cloak?